fable

Chapter 6 - THE BROTHER AND SISTER WHO BLAMED EACH OTHER

Malcolm’s proffer was ruthless.

He described Serena as the emotional engine.

She wanted to become Mrs. Vale.

She feared Adrian would postpone the wedding if the merger fight worsened.

She suggested medication first.

Malcolm only “professionalized” it.

Serena’s version:

Malcolm designed the scheme.

Wynn supplied drugs.

She followed instructions.

She believed doses were safe.

She wanted Adrian calm, not incapacitated.

Both told partial truths.

Emails filled gaps.

The first reference to medication came from Serena.

Text to Malcolm:

Wynn gave him something after the charity dinner and Adrian finally stopped fighting everyone. Can we use that?

There.

Idea.

Then Malcolm:

Not casually. If anything, structured.

There.

System.

Then Wynn:

I will not do this without written medical rationale.

Malcolm:

Then write one.

There.

Escalation.

No single mastermind at first.

A bad idea became a plan because three people each removed one boundary.

That was more believable than one evil genius.

Then came financial motive.

Malcolm had hidden losses in a private infrastructure fund.

The merger would bury them inside a larger balance sheet.

If deal failed, Vale Global audit committee might discover them.

Potential exposure:

900 million in overstated assets.

Not personal theft entirely.

Some aggressive valuation.

Some actual fraud.

Adrian opposed the merger partly because he suspected the numbers.

He did not know Malcolm caused them.

So Malcolm needed the deal for survival.

Serena needed the wedding for status and future wealth.

Wynn needed money and professional access.

Their motives overlapped.

Then prosecutors found Serena had been moving personal assets.

Not fleeing.

Preparing.

She transferred 4 million into a trust controlled by her cousin.

Why?

“Wedding planning.”

No.

It was asset protection.

She knew risk.

Then Malcolm’s attorney attacked Lucas.

Child witness.

Selective recording.

Possible coaching by his toxicologist mother.

I expected that.

So did the prosecution.

They did not rely on Lucas’s memory for technical facts.

Only what he saw.

Serena with vial.

Malcolm handing vial.

Words recorded.

Video authenticated digitally.

No need to make a nine-year-old carry the case.

Good.

Then defense attacked me.

Former toxicologist who “rediscovered career relevance” through scandal.

Ugly.

Effective rhetorically.

I answered:

“I left toxicology voluntarily.”

“Because of professional misconduct?”

“No.”

“Because your testimony was criticized in a prior pharmaceutical case?”

“Yes.”

There it was.

They opened my old wound.

Twelve years earlier, I worked on a workplace exposure case.

I concluded a solvent likely contributed to illness.

Company experts disagreed.

The case settled.

I was attacked publicly.

No finding of misconduct.

Still, my confidence collapsed.

Then defense said:

“You saw Adrian’s symptoms and decided to relive your old career.”

“No.”

“You interpreted everything through toxicology.”

“I did not diagnose him.”

“But you suspected poisoning.”

“Yes.”

“Before any lab confirmed it.”

“Yes.”

“Could that have influenced your son?”

Important.

I answered:

“I never told Lucas Adrian was being poisoned.”

True.

Lucas came to me first.

Then prosecution played his first recorded message to me.

Mom, I think Miss Serena puts medicine in his drink.

Timestamp before I began preserving evidence.

That protected both of us.

Then Serena’s plea agreement finalized.

She admitted conspiracy, administering medication without consent, fraud, and attempted interference with evidence.

Not attempted murder.

She would testify.

Adrian asked me:

“Should I hate her?”

Strange question.

“Not my job.”

“I still love her.”

“That can be true.”

“She did this.”

“Yes.”

He looked angry.

“At me?”

“At reality.”

Fair.

Then Serena testified before the grand jury.

One line leaked later:

“We told ourselves he would thank us after the merger.”

There it was.

The ancient justification.

We know better for you.

Then Malcolm refused all pleas.

He wanted trial.

May you like

He believed he could separate business misconduct from medical conspiracy.

He almost succeeded.

Related Stories

Other posts